UNDP Rule of Law and Human Rights Annual Report

This section presents the progress and results achieved by the Global Programme in 2023, aggregating results across the contexts supported by the Global Programme vis-à-vis its results framework. The tables below reflect the results achieved in the thematic areas of rule of law, human rights, justice and security (Outcome 1 and associated Outputs 1-4), in strengthening knowledge creation and sharing and contributing to policy discourse (Outcome 2 and associated Outputs 5 and 6). Operational effectiveness indicators reflect the Global Programme’s results in promoting an enabling operational environment.

The Results Framework of the Global Programme consists of two outcomes.

Under Outcome 1, the Global Programme invested in inclusive, people-centred systems that provide quality justice and security services and uphold and protect human rights in order that they become trusted and accessible, especially in contexts affected by crisis, conflict or fragility. In 2023, the Global Programme has redoubled its efforts in strengthening the capacities of institutions, systems and stakeholders to support the fulfilment of nationally and internationally ratified human rights obligations. The Global Programme, in 2023 alone, supported strengthening of human rights institutions, systems and stakeholders in 34 countries and territories, in addition to strengthening the private sector in 25 countries for advancing human rights.

The Global Programme made concerted efforts in promoting people-centred approaches to justice and security in 2023, supporting the development of nearly 60 people-centred justice or security policies, services and innovative digital solutions. The Global Programme also provided catalytic seed funding to 23 contexts for access to justice projects/programmes and introduced or strengthened people-centred and gender-sensitive transitional justice solutions in 11 contexts. With Global Programme support, over 7,000 justice and security personnel strengthened their capacity to provide people-centred services in 2023, more than doubling the results achieved in 2022. Overall, the Global Programme achieved or exceeded the targets of 62 percent of its output indicators in Outcome 1, with an additional 26 percent achieving at least 80 percent of the target.

Under Outcome 2, the Global Programme actively contributed to regional and global-level policy on rule of law, justice, security and human rights that is evidence-based, affirms a development perspective, and informs high-quality programming. Over 50 new methods, including tools, frameworks and processes for monitoring, evaluation and learning, were adopted at global, regional and national levels in 2023. The Global Programme produced 3 new publications that have been distributed globally on protecting human rights in constitutions, on customary and informal justice, and on human rights and SDG systems integration, in addition to contributing to 11 key UN global learning and/or policy documents. The Global Programme led or supported 80+ learning-focused mechanisms (e.g. workshops, trainings, COPs, theory of change reflection sessions etc.) at global, regional and country levels, in addition to convening or contributing to about 60 policy discussions/events. Overall, the Global Programme achieved or exceeded the targets of 61% of its output indicators in Outcome 2, with an additional 10% achieving at least 80% of the target.

The Global Programme continues to strive for operational effectiveness. In 2023, the Global Programme funded 73 projects/programmes that integrated a human rights-based approach. Thirty-four contexts that received Global Programme support set at least 15 percent of their project budget for gender investments. Female staff remain well represented in the Global Programme team across the contract modalities. Overall, the Global Programme achieved or exceeded the targets of 92 percent of its Operational Effectiveness indicators.

Overall, in 2023, the Global Programme provided support to 108 contexts. As an outcome of these efforts, the Global Programme made important contributions to UNDP’s global efforts for supporting people’s access to justice and using digital technologies and services in ways that improve their lives. The Global Programme’s policy activities and programming both benefitted from and contributed to strengthening the partnerships with 85 institutions including UN entities, International Financial Institutions, the private sector, civil society organizations, multi-stakeholders or intergovernmental organizations, government agencies or public institutions, academia and think tanks.

programme outcome 1

Inclusive, people-centred systems that provide quality justice and security services and uphold and protect human rights are trusted and accessible, especially in contexts affected by crisis, conflict or fragility.

Outcome Indicator	Baseline & Year	Results Year 1 (2022)	Results Year 2 (2023)	Data Source	Reporting Notes
1.1 Global Programme (GP) supported contexts’ average World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index score; and 1.1.1. Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG) (for African countries, only)	0.49 (2022) 46.99 (2021)	0.49 46.99 (2021, latestdata)	0.50 48.76 (2021, latest data)	World Justice Project Rule of Law Index 2022, Ibrahim Index on African Governance, GP reporting.	Of 108 GP-supported contexts, 79 have a Rule of Law Index 2023 score; 48 GP-supported contexts are in the IIAG 2021. GP support and GP-supported refer to the provision of tailored, context specific assistance provided through the Global Programme and may include, but is not limited to, pipeline or non-pipeline funding, technical and strategic expertise and advice provided by ROLSHR staff or consultants, or the mobilisation of agile capacities.
1.2 Number of victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population, by sex and age	5.7 (2019)	5.6 (2020)	5.8 (2021, latest data) Male: 9.3 Female: 2.2	Corporate data, IRRF Development Outcome 3, Outcome Indicator 5	The data sources for SDG 16.1.1 are The Secretary-General's Report on Sustainable Development Goals, Special Edition A/78/80-E/2023/64 and the Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023, Special Edition.
1.3 Number of strategic partnerships for advancing programming and policy objectives with UN entities International Financial Institutions private sector civil society organizations multistakeholders or intergovernmental organizations government agencies or public institutions academia and think tanks	52 (2021) 19 1 1 11 19	73 29 1 3 8 23 5 4	85 30 1 3 11 28 9 3	GP reporting	Strategic partnerships are any formal agreement for cooperation entered into by the Global Programme with another entity. This could include, for example, an MOU, a partnership agreement, or email exchange detailing the arrangements for partnering on a specific project or thematic area of work. Multi-stakeholder partnership refers to a partnership that brings together a range of different actors such as civil society, governments, international bodies, media, and academic or research institutions. Civil society organizations may include, but are not limited to, faith-based organizations, regional and international non-government organizations, academia, think tanks and research institutions, professional associations. 1
1.4 GP-supported contexts’ average NHRI accreditation status	Out of 38 contexts(2022): A: 16 B: 10; Lapsed: 1 N.A: 11	GP-supported contexts (as per output indicator 1.2): out of 38 contexts: A: 16 B: 10; Lapsed: 1 N.A: 11 Globally A: 84 B: 33	Of 34 GP-supported contexts: A: 18 B: 7; Lapsed: 1 N.A: 8 Globally A: 88 B: 32	GANHRI, Chart of the Status of National Institutions Accredited by the Global Alliance of NHRIs as at 20 December 2023	GP-supported contexts' accreditation status (per output indicator 1.2): A: Bolivia, Burundi, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Georgia, Ghana, Jordan, Kenya, Mexico, Nepal, Malawi, Moldova, Morocco, Nigeria, Peru, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Zimbabwe. B: Bahrain, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, North Macedonia, The Maldives, Tunisia, Turkiye.Lapsed: Burkina Faso. N.A.: Bhutan, Brazil, Comoros, Lao PDR, Mozambique, Pakistan, Suriname, Turkmenistan.
1.5 Number of people supported, who have access to justice.	78,059,933 2021	84,986,917	90,086,497	Corporate data, UNDP overall reporting	Baseline: UNDP IRRF 2018-2021, indicator 2.2.3.2.A.2. 2023 results were calculated from UNDP IRRF 2023 data at indicator 2.2.3a, b, c. This indicator is cumulative.

OUTPUT 1

Legal frameworks and underlying norms and practice are more inclusive and non-discriminatory and people have greater agency and opportunities to know and claim their rights, solve disputes and seek redress for rights violations.

Outcome Indicator	Baseline & Year	Results Year 1 (2022)	TARGET 2023	RESULTS YEAR 2 (2023)	Data Source	Reporting Notes
1.1Number of contexts where GP support strengthened legal and/or policy strategies or frameworks to expand civic space	4 (2022)	4	4	15	GP reporting	Eritrea, Ghana, Honduras, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lao PDR, Madagascar, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Nepal, Thailand, Turkiye, Viet Nam
1.2 Number of contexts where GP-supported human rights institutions, systems or stakeholders strengthened capacities to support the fulfilment of nationally and internationally ratified human rights obligations 3 4	38 (2022)	38	40	50	Corporate data and GP reporting	Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bhutan, Bolivia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Colombia, Comoros, Costa Rica, Cote d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Eswatini, Georgia, Ghana, Haiti, India, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lao PDR, Lebanon, Liberia, Malawi, The Maldives, Mexico, Moldova, Morocco, Mozambique, Nepal, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Peru, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Suriname, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Turkiye, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Yemen, Zimbabwe This indicator is cumulative. Of 50 contexts, 23 have IRRF data in 2023. According to the IRRF rating scale for this indicator, 11 contexts have reported the capacity as high or very high (see IRRF indicator 2.2.1b).
1.3 Number of contexts in which GP support provided to constitution making processes by introducing or supporting at least one mechanism for civic engagement 3	6 (2022)	6	4	2	Corporate data and GP reporting	Belize, Chile Of 2 contexts, 1 has IRRF data in 2023. According to the IRRF rating scale for this indicator, 1 context has reported the work as almost complete (see IRRF indicator 2.4.1a). 6
1.4 1.4 Number of contexts with GP-funded access to justice programmes or projects introduced or supported	24 (2020)	17	20	23	GP reporting	Algeria, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Bolivia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Chad, Cote d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Iraq, Kenya, Lebanon, Libya, Mozambique, Myanmar, Pakistan, Somalia, Tanzania, Uganda, Viet Nam, Yemen
1.5 1.5 Number of contexts where GP support has contributed to the establishment and/or strengthening of justice and security mechanisms, processes and frameworks to prevent, respond to, and address sexual and gender based violence/conflict-related sexual violence	17 (2022)	17	20	17	GP reporting	Cameroon, Central African Republic, Colombia, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominican Republic, Guinea, Indonesia, Kenya, Libya, Mali, Mexico, Nepal, Pakistan, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Ukraine

OUTPUT 2

Mechanisms to hold duty bearers and power holders to account in order to ensure the rule of law and promotion and protection of human rights are in place and actively used.

Outcome Indicator	Baseline & Year	Results Year 1 (2022)	TARGET 2023	RESULTS YEAR 2 (2023)	Data Source	Reporting Notes
2.1 Number of contexts in which GP support has contributed to a) implementation of UPR recommendations b) closer integration between human rights and SDG systems 4	a) 5 (2022) b) 7 (2020)	a) 5 b) 13	a) 10 b) 13	a) 8 b) 19	GP reporting	a) Bahrain, Botswana, Comoros, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Uruguay b) Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Eswatini, Guinea, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Niger, Pakistan, Morocco, Mozambique, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Tunisia, Uruguay, Uzbekistan This indicator is cumulative.
2.2 Number of contexts where GP-supported private sector institutions, systems, or stakeholders (including publicly owned companies) have strengthened capacities to support fulfilment of nationally and internationally ratified human rights obligations 3 4	25 (2022)	25	27	31	Corporate data, GP reporting	Azerbaijan, Djibouti, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao PDR, Malaysia, The Maldives, Mexico, Mongolia, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Peru, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkiye, Ukraine, Viet Nam, Zambia This indicator is cumulative. Of 31 contexts, 10 have 2023 IRRF data. According to the IRRF rating scale for this indicator, no contexts have reported the capacity as high or very high (see IRRF indicator 2.2.1c).
2.3 Number of contexts where GP support has improved capacities of justice and security institutions for oversight and accountability 4	11 (2022)	11	13	16	GP reporting	Belarus, Burundi, Central African Republic, Cote d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eswatini, Fiji, Guinea, Iraq, Kenya, Lebanon, Libya, Nigeria, State of Palestine, Sudan, and Kosovo* This indicator is cumulative.
2.4 Number of contexts with GP-introduced or strengthened people-centred and gender-sensitive, transitional justice solutions	9 (2022)	9	10	11	GP reporting	Central African Republic, Chad, Colombia, Ethiopia, The Gambia, Guatemala, Libya, Mali, South Sudan, Tunisia, Uruguay

OUTPUT 3

Justice and security systems are service-oriented and better able to protect human rights and respond to people’s justice and security needs through high-quality performance.

Outcome Indicator	Baseline & Year	Results Year 1 (2022)	TARGET 2023	RESULTS YEAR 2 (2023)	Data Source	Reporting Notes
3.1 Number of contexts where GP-support to rule of law and justice institutions, systems, or stakeholders has strengthened capacities to support fulfilment of nationally and internationally ratified human rights obligations 3 4	22 (2022)	22	24	37	Corporate data, GP reporting	Antigua & Barbuda, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Barbados, Belize, Bhutan, Burundi, Cameroon, Chad, Comoros, Cote d'Ivoire, Dominica, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Georgia, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Moldova, Morocco, Saint Kitts & Nevis, Saint Lucia, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Trinidad & Tobago, Turkiye, Turkmenistan, Ukraine This indicator is cumulative. Of 37 contexts, 13 have 2023 IRRF data. According to the IRRF rating scale for this indicator, 3 contexts have reported the capacity as high or very high (see IRRF indicator 2.2.1a).
3.2 Number of new or strengthened people-centred justice policies, services or innovative digital solutions developed with GP support	45 (2022)	45	48	42	GP reporting	At global and regional levels: Africa, Arab States, Asia-Pacific, Europe and Central Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. At country level: Algeria, Armenia, Bolivia, Brazil, Chad, Colombia, Cote d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ethiopia, Gabon, Georgia, Guinea-Bissau, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Lebanon, Mali, Moldova, Morocco, Mozambique, Nepal, Nigeria, State of Palestine, Samoa, Senegal, Singapore, Solomon Islands, South Sudan, Timor-Leste, Uganda, Ukraine, Yemen.
3.3 Number of new or strengthened people-centred security policies, services or innovative digital solutions developed with GP support	13 (2022)	13	15	17	GP reporting	At regional levels: Europe and Central Asia. At country level: Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Georgia, Jamaica, Moldova, Somalia, South Sudan, Ukraine.
3.4 Number of justice and security institutions with enhanced capacity to provide people-centred services, in line with human rights/gender/LNOB principles, through GP-supported interventions	94 (2022)	94	100	42	GP reporting	Institutions were supported in the following contexts: Algeria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eswatini, Fiji, Guinea-Bissau, Jamaica, Kenya, Madagascar, Mozambique, Rwanda, Senegal, Somalia, South Sudan, Sweden, Switzerland, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Yemen. The results include 40 institutions at the national level and 2 at the sub-national level. In the previous reporting period, sub-national institutions outnumbered the national institutions that were supported due to the work on strengthening policing. Sweden and Switzerland were participants in a training project to strengthen deployment of women corrections officers in peacekeeping settings; the other participants were all from the Global South.
3.5 Number of justice and security personnel with enhanced capacity to provide people-centred services, in line with human rights/gender/LNOB principles, through GP-supported interventions	3,025 (2022)	3,025	3,176	7,321	GP reporting	Personnel were supported in the following contexts: Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Democractic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Gabon, The Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq, Jamaica, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritania, Morocco, Mozambique, Rwanda, Sao Tome, Senegal, South Africa, South Sudan, Sweden, Switzerland, Togo, Zimbabwe.

OUTPUT 4

Community security, safety and resilience strengthened through people-centred strategies, processes and mechanisms.

Outcome Indicator	Baseline & Year	Results Year 1 (2022)	TARGET 2023	RESULTS YEAR 2 (2023)	Data Source	Reporting Notes
4.1 Number of contexts in which GP-supported local government, justice and security providers respond in a more holistic & people-centred way to community safety and security needs and grievances	4 (2022)	4	5	7	GP reporting	Burkina Faso, Cote d'Ivoire, Fiji, Honduras, Iraq, Mozambique, Yemen
4.2 Number of contexts where GP support introduced or strengthened gender-sensitive and people-centred evidence-based security strategies for reducing armed violence and/or controlling small arms at the community level	3 (2022)	3	4	8	GP reporting	Cameroon, Ghana, Honduras, Jamaica, Kyrgyzstan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, South Sudan
4.3 Number of GP-funded integrated programmes/ projects in stabilization and/or triple nexus contexts that support people centred community security and social cohesion and: a) financial volume of support b) number of joint programmes/projects	12 (6 GP3 funded, 6 GP4 funded) (2022) a) US$ 3,353,534 ($1,603,534 GP3; $1,750,000 GP4) (2022) b) 5 (2022)	12 (6 GP3 funded, 6 GP4 funded) (2022) a) US$ 3,353,534 ($1,603,534 GP3; $1,750,000 GP4) (2022) b) 5 (2022)	12 a) $3M b) 5	Total 15 (13 GP4 funded; 2 GP3 funded) a) Total US$ 3,713,540 (GP4 funds: US$ 3,013,540; GP3 funds: US$ 700,000) b) 7	GP reporting	Results reflect projects that were operational in 2023 and funded by GP4 and GP3. GP4 funded, allocated and operational in 2023 = 8: Burkina Faso (technical support only), Burundi ($200,000), Democratic Republic of the Congo ($250,000), Lebanon ($200,000), Mali ($200,000), Myanmar ($108,000), Somalia ($205,300), Yemen ($300,240). GP4 funded, allocated in 2022 and operational in 2023 = 5: Cameroon (SALIENT, 500,000), Lebanon ($300,000), Moldova ($250,000), Myanmar ($300,000), Mozambique ($200,000). GP3 funded and operational in 2023 = 2: Haiti ($200,000), South Sudan (SALIENT, $500,000). Joint programmes were implemented in: Haiti, South Sudan (both GP3); and Cameroon, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Lebanon, Mali, Somalia (all GP4).

programme outcome 2

Regional and global level policy on rule of law, justice, security & human rights is evidence-based, affirms a development perspective and informs high-quality programming.

Outcome Indicator	Baseline & Year	Results Year 1 (2022)	Results Year 2 (2023)	Data Source	Reporting Notes
2.1 Average score of Programme Quality Index for GP-funded contexts 2	Highly satisfactory, GP3 (2019) Highly satisfactory, SALIENT (2020)	Exemplary, GP4 (2022)	3.83 (High)	UNDP Quality Assurance Portal	The methodology applied in 2022 and at baseline years was for the overall GP. In 2023, the QA score was calculated as an average of the total number of GP-funded contexts in 2023; this method will be be applied for future reporting.
2.2 GP-supported GPN/Express One Roster deployments: a)Number of: UNDP Staff Consultants UNVs Stand by Partner experts (all by gender); b) Volume of deployments (in USD) c) Expert deployments conducted under the GFP framework, including deployments by DPO Standing Justice and Corrections and Standing Police Capacity (expenses are covered by DPO, thus, amount not available in UNDP)	a) 1 (IPSA, female) 22 (12 female, 10 male) 0 2 (1 female, 1 male) b)US$ 746,000 c) 24 (including remote deployment during COVID-19)	a) 3 (IPSA, 3 female) 23 (15 female, 8 male) 0 1 b)US$ 864,509 c) 12	a) 1 (IPSA, female) 15 (9 female, 6 male) 2 (2 female) 2 (2 female) b)US$ 469,034 c) 10	GP reporting, GFP reporting	Disaggregation by sex is stated, where applicable. This is a proxy indicator for the Global Programme’s agile capacities and responsiveness to requests for the rapid provision of high-quality technical and strategic expertise, particularly in contexts experiencing conflict, crisis and/or fragility. Deployments may be cross-cutting, supporting several outputs within the results framework. Deployments may include UNDP staff missions (both virtual and in-person) and detailed assignments, including to HQ for the purposes of supporting Phase IV delivery.
2.3 Number of GP-supported impact, country programme, thematic and outcome reviews, assessments and evaluations	2 (2022)	2	2	GP reporting	SALIENT pilot phase evaluation (preparatory activities commenced) and SALIENT lessons learned exercise.
2.4 Number of people using digital technologies and services in ways that improves their lives, in GP-supported contexts	2,575,766 in 19 contexts (2022)	19 of 104 contexts have IRRF data, totalling 2,575,766, including: Female: 827,524 Male: 1,608,763 Sex-disaggregated data unavailable: 139,479	32,903,451 Female: 8,317,837 Male: 11,050,380 Sex-disaggregated data unavailable: 13,535,234	Corporate data (see IRRF Enabler E.1, Indicator E1.3), GP reporting	Disaggregation by sex is stated, where applicable. Of 108 GP-supported contexts, 34 had IRRF data.

OUTPUT 5

Strengthened Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) systems support project/ programme design and implementation.

Outcome Indicator	Baseline & Year	Results Year 1 (2022)	TARGET 2023	Results Year 2 (2023)	Data Source	Reporting Notes
5.1 Number of new methods (including tools, frameworks and processes) for GP-related monitoring, evaluation and learning adopted at: global regional country level	0 (2021)	0 2 15	1 3 16	3 7 48	GP reporting	Methods were developed in the Asia-Pacific and Latin America and the Caribbean regions. Methods were developed in Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Chile, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Indonesia, Jamaica, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lao PDR, Madagascar, Mali, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, State of Palestine, Peru, Samoa, Sao Tome and Principe, Solomon Islands, South Sudan, Thailand,Tunisia, Turkiye, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zimbabwe.
5.2 Number of key UNDP global knowledge and learning products produced and disseminated by GP; in a) English; and/or b) other languages	a) 5 (2020) b) 0 (2020)	a) 14 b) 1	a) 3 (total 6) b) 3 (total 4)	a) 3 in english b) 2 in other languages	GP reporting	New products produced in English: Diverse Pathways to People-Centred Justice: Report of the Working Group on Customary and Informal Justice and SDG16+; Human Rights and SDG Systems Integration Issue Brief; and Protecting Human Rights in Constitutions. There were no joint products. Products produced in other languages: Global Principles for the Capacity Assessment of National Human Rights Institutions; and UN Good Practices: How The Universal Periodic Review Process Supports Sustainable Development. These were previously published in 2022; the translations were published in 2023.
5.3 Number of GP-led or GP-supported knowledge and learning-focused mechanisms (e.g. workshops, trainings, COPs, theory of change reflection sessions etc.) at: global regional and country level	33 (2022) 15 (2022) 5 (2022)	33 15 5	43 36 7	GP reporting	Results reflect knowledge and learning-focused mechanisms at global, regional (all regions) and country levels (Bhutan, Cuba, Ethiopia, Kyrgyzstan, The Maldives, Mexico, Mozambique).

OUTPUT 6

Sustained high-quality, evidence-informed analytics and learning contribute to shaping global and regional level policy discourse on rule of law, justice, security and human rights.

Outcome Indicator	Baseline & Year	Results Year 1 (2022)	TARGET 2023	Results Year 2 (2023)	Data Source	Reporting Notes
6.1 Number of key UN global learning and/or policy documents published referencing GP-specific evidence-based findings/knowledge/results	11 (2022)	11	7	11	GP reporting	Contributions to key UN global learning/policy documents in the areas of gender justice, human rights, rule of law, security and transitional justice.
6.2 Stakeholders’ general perception of GP analytics and policy work in terms of a) quantity /frequency; b) quantity of outputs; c) level of impact on global rule of law, justice, security and human rights policy landscape	a) Appropriate: 71% (2022) b) Excellent: 29%; Good: 71% (2022) c) High level: 57%; Average level: 43% (2022)	a) Appropriate: 71% b) Excellent: 29%; Good: 71% c) High level: 57%; Average level: 43%	a) Appropriate: 72% b) Excellent: 30% c) High level: 58%	a) Appropriate: 75% b) Excellent: 25% c) High level: 50% Average level: 50%	GP reporting	According to the stakeholder survey results: a) 75% of respondents agree that the quantity/frequency is at an appropriate level. b) 25% of the respondents agree that the quality of the outputs is excellent, while the remaining 75% agree that the quality is good. c) 50% of the respondents found the GP knowledge and policy work are having a high impact on the global policy landscape (the remainder - 50% - rated the level of impact as average).
6.3 Number of rule of law, justice, security and human rights related policy discussions/events (UN and non-UN): a) that are convened by GP b) to which GP is invited to contribute (e.g. staff representation or expertise, data); c) to which the GP contributes at the: global regional and country level	a) 28 (2022) b) 41 (2022) c) 27 (2022) 10 (2022) 4 (2022)	a) 28 b) 41 c) 27 10 4	a) 25 b) 40 c) 25 10 5	a) 27 b) 31 c) 15 7 9	GP reporting	Results reflect rule of law, justice, security and human rights related policy discussions/events at global and regional level and country levels, which are convened by GP (a), or with GP contribution (b + c).
6.4 6.4 Number of downloads of key GP-produced policy documents and knowledge products	2,174 (2022)	2,174	2,283	514	GP reporting, Google Analytics	Total downloads: 514 Total page views: 2,387 N.B. Google Analytics does not provide an exact number of downloads, as it applies some thresholds and does not count the number of downloads from the servers where the assets are cached (CDN - Content Delivery Network).

OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS

Outcome Indicator	Baseline & Year	Results Year 1 (2022)	TARGET YEAR 2 2023	Results Year 2 (2023)	Data Source	Reporting Notes
OE1 Number of country-level GP-funded projects/programmes that integrate a human rights-based approach	34 (2022)	64 funded by GP4, plus 37 funded by GP3 but operational in 2022	35	73 funded by GP4, and 2 funded by GP3 but operational in 2023	GP reporting	GP4 countries = 37: Algeria, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Cote d'Ivoire, Cuba, Chile, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Fiji, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Libya, Mexico, Moldova, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Senegal, Serbia, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Viet Nam, Yemen BHR countries = 17: Ghana, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lao PDR, Mexico, Mongolia, Mozambique, Nepal, Pakistan, Peru, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkiye, Ukraine, Viet Nam SALIENT countries = 8: Cameroon, Ghana, Honduras, Jamaica, Kyrgyzstan, Panama, Papua New Guinea Gender Justice Platform countries = 31: Algeria, Bangladesh, The Bahamas, Barbados, Bhutan, Burundi, Colombia, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Indonesia, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, Zimbabwe TPP countries = 13: Comoros, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Georgia, Jordan, Malawi, The Maldives, Moldova, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Peru, Timor-Leste GP3 countries (funds allocated in 2021 but project operational in 2023) = 2: Egypt, South Sudan (SALIENT)
OE2 Number of contexts where the respective GP portfolio of projects/ programmes meets the set 15% budget quota for gender investments	18 (2022)	18 (Gender Justice Platform)	19	34	GP reporting	Contexts supported include SALIENT countries: Cameroon, Jamaica, Papua New Guinea and South Sudan; and Gender Justice Platform countries: Algeria, Bangladesh, The Bahamas, Barbados, Bhutan, Burundi, Colombia, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Indonesia, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, Zimbabwe. All GP-funded projects are GEN2, making a significant contribution to gender equality and/or the empowerment of women and girls. Gender Justice Platform is a GEN3 project.
OE3 Total number and proportion of full-time female staff among ROLSHR team contract holders: international professional staff general service staff and other contract categories (incl. interns, seconded staff, UNVs, consultants etc.)	32 total, 69% female (2022) 3 total, 67% female (2022) 48 total, 54 female (2022)	32 total, 69% female (2022) 3 total, 67% female (2022) 48 total, 54 female (2022)	50% 50% 50%	4 total, 71% 6 total, 67% women 16 total, 81% women	GP reporting	international professional staff: 24 women / 34 international professional staff = 71% women -17 women / 24 P -7 women / 10 IPSA -3 vacant P; 3 vacant IPSA general service staff: 4 women / 6 G = 67% women -1 woman / 3 G positions -1 woman / 1 IPSA -1 vacant -2 women / 2 DA other contract categories (interns, UNVs, secondees, consultants): 13 women / 16 other categories = 81% women -1 woman / 1 intern -2 women / 2 UNVs -2 women / 2 secondees -1 woman / 2 JPOs -7 women / 9 consultants
OE4 Global Focal Point for the Rule of Law (GFP) partnerships: (a) Total number of GFP-funded joint programmes/ projects (b) Total budget amount of GFP-funded joint programmes (c) Number of contexts where GFP-supported joint rule of law assessments, strategies, programmes and/or frameworks developed (complementing a UN political strategy or reinforcing implementation of a UNSC mission mandate)	a) 3 (2022) b) US$800,000 (2022) c) 5 (2022)	a) 3 (GP4 2022), plus 3 (GP3) b) US$ 800,000 (GP4), plus 795,534 (GP3) c) 5	a) 4 b) US$ 800,001 c) 6	a) 5 (GP4 funded) and 1 (GP3 funded) b) GP4 funds: US$ 1,050,000; GP3 funds: US$ 200,000 c) 2	GP reporting	Results reflect projects that were operational in 2023 and funded by GP4 and GP3. a) and b) GP4 funded = 2: Democratic Republic of the Congo ($50,000), Mali ($200,000) GP4 funded, allocated in 2022 and operational in 2023 = 3: Central African Republic ($300,000), Democratic Republic of the Congo ($200,000), Libya ($300,000) GP3 funded and operational in 2023 = 1: Haiti ($200,000) c) Haiti, Mali

i. UN entities: Chief Digital Office of UNDP; Cross Pillar Analysis for Prevention - UN Working Group at LAC, Regional Level on PBA and RC work (OHCHR, OCHA, UNDP) led by Regional PBA; Executive Office of the Secretary General (EOSG); Global Focal Point for the Rule of Law (GFP); Inter-agency Task Force on Policing; Inter-Agency Working Group on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration, and the Inter-agency Security Sector Reform Task Force (IAWG - DDR & IASSRTF); Issue Based Coalition at Regional Level (LAC region); The Task Team on Law and Policy on Internal Displacement (TTLP), Global Protection Cluster; UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPO) via Global Focal Point; UN Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs (DPPA); UN Development Coordination Office (DCO); UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR); UN Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict; UN Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Violence against Children; UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC); UN Team of Experts on the Rule of Law and Sexual Violence in Conflict (ToE); United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD); UNDP-OHCHR Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI): Tri-Partite Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions; UNDP-UN Women: Gender Justice Partnership; UNDP-UNHCR: Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance; UNDP-UNODA partnership: SALIENT, Saving Lives Entity, including UNODA Regional Centres; UNESCO; UNFCCC Regional Collaboration Centre for Asia-Pacific; United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF); United Nations Coordinating Action on Small Arms (CASA); United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP); United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR); United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI); United Nations Police (UNPOL); United Nations University (UN University’s Centre for Policy Research). ii. International Financial Institutions: World Bank. iii. Private sector: Behavioural Insights Team (BIT); Private Sector Partnership for the Rule of Law; UN Global Compact. iv. Civil Society Organisations: Arab Association of Constitutional Law; Asia Pacific Forum; Asia Pacific Network of Environment Defenders (APNED); Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT); Business and Human Rights Resource Centre; Civil Association for Equality and Justice (ACIJ); Due Process of Law Foundation (DPLF); Hague Institute for Innovation of Law (HiiL); Institute of African Women in Law (IAWL); International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ); Namati: Innovations in Legal Empowerment. v. Multi-stakeholders or intergovernmental organisations: African Union (African Commission on Human and People’s Rights, African Court on Human and People’s Rights, African Union Commission); Banco de Desarrollo de América Latina y el Caribe (CAF); Conference of Constitutional Jurisdictions in Africa (CCJA); Conference of Ministers of Justice of Ibero-American Countries (COMJIB); Geneva Center for Security Sector Governance (DCAF); Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies; Ibero-American Association of Public Prosecutors (AIAMP); Ibero-American Network of Judicial Schools; Insitituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos (Interamerican Institute on Human Rights. (IIDH)); Inter-American Association of Public Defenders (AIDEF); Inter-American Institute of Human Rights (IIHR); International Development Law Organisation (IDLO); International Foundation for Ibero-American Public Administration and Public Policy (FIIAPP); International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA); International Labour Organisation (ILO); International Legal Foundation; International Network for Open Justice (RIJA); International Security Sector Advisory Team (ISSAT); Justice Action Coalition; Latin American and the Caribbean Network for Democracy (REDLAD); Latin American and the Caribbean Women’s Security and Defense Network (AMASSURU); League of Arab States; Open Society Justice Initiative and the World Justice Project on Measuring Access to Civil Justice; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE); Pathfinders for Peaceful, Just and Inclusive Societies; Working Group on Customary and Informal Justice; Working Group on Transitional Justice and SDG16+. vi. Government agencies: Arab Network for National Human Rights Institutions; Danish Institute for Human Rights; Folke Bernadotte Academy; Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA); National Legal Aid Service Authority India (NLASA); Norwegian Resource Bank for Democracy and Human Rights (NORDEM); The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ); United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through UNDP InfoSegura and CARISECURE regional projects; United States International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs Section (INL). vii. Academia and think tanks: Institute for Security Studies (ISS); Justice Studies Center of the Americas (CEJA); New York University’s Center for International Cooperation.

The methodology applied in 2022 and at baseline years was for the overall GP. In 2023, the QA score was calculated as an average of the total number of GP-funded contexts in 2023; this method will be applied for future reporting.

The following indicators are modified to track the number of contexts based on GP reporting, instead of proportion of contexts based on UNDP IRRF data: Output Indicators 1.2, 1.3, 2.2 and 3.1. Results for year 2022 have been re-calculated.

The following indicators are cumulative, as indicated in the reporting notes: Outcome Indicator 1.5, Output Indicators 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 3.1.

The IRRF rating scale for this indicator at country level is as follows: 0 = Not in place, 1 = Capacity low, 2 = Capacity neither low nor high, 3 = Capacity high, 4 = Capacity very high.

The IRRF rating scale for this indicator at country level is as follows: 0 = Not in place, 1 = Work started, 2 = Work in progress, 3 = Work almost complete, 4 = In place.