Results Framework
The Global Programme’s Results Framework tracks aggregate results across its 32 priority contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, and Kosovo[1]. In the tables below, we provide our results achieved per each of our global indicators since 2015. In 2019, we achieved over 82% of our global targets.
[1] References to Kosovo shall be understood to be in the context of Security Council resolution 1244 (1999)
Political Engagement
! INSTRUCTIONS: Scroll < > to view additional table columns
Expected Programme Outputs |
Output Indicators2 |
Baseline |
Results |
||||||
Value |
Year |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 Target |
2019 Actual |
Key Evidence |
||
Output 1: A political environment that strengthens rule of law and human rights is further enabled. |
1.1 Number of contexts with improved capacities for oversight and/or governance mechanisms in the security sector |
73 |
2015 |
94 |
145 |
206 |
13 |
22 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: ACHIEVED |
1.2 Joint programmes in place to increase the impact of UN system delivery in creating political spaces for the development of justice, security and human rights institutions |
510 |
2015 |
1011 |
1512 |
3213 |
11 |
37 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: ACHIEVED |
|
1 References to Kosovo shall be understood to be in the context of Security Council resolution 1244 (1999)
2 This framework tracks results across the 32 priority countries (including Lebanon and Jordan as affected by the Syrian crisis) for UNDP’s Global Programme on Strengthening the Rule of Law and Human Rights for Sustaining Peace and Fostering Development (Phase III) to illustrate progress year-on-year.
3 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Iraq, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Tunisia
4 2016 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Colombia, Iraq, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Tunisia
5 2017 Contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Liberia, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Tunisia
6 2018 Contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Liberia, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo[1]
7 Information verified through “IRRF Indicators” is data gathered through UNDP’s corporate reporting system, the Integrated Results and Resources Framework, which is aligned with UNDP’s Strategic Plan.
8 IRRF Indicator 2.2.3.3 measures “Number of additional contexts with strengthened capacities for governance and oversight of rule of law institutions”
9 Information verified through the ‘RoLSHR Reporting’ (written in italics) is data gathered from various Rule of Law, Security, and Human Rights for Sustaining Peace and Development team processes, i.e. annual reporting, mission reports, direct communication with Country Offices, fact sheets, meeting outcomes, briefing notes, etc.
10 Baseline Contexts: Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali, Somalia, Sudan
11 2016 Contexts: Central African Republic (2 projects), Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Mali (2 projects), Liberia, Somalia, State of Palestine, Sudan
12 2017 Contexts: Central African Republic (2 projects), Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Mali (2 projects), Myanmar, Lebanon, Libya, Liberia, Somalia, State of Palestine, Sudan
13 2018 Contexts: Central African Republic (3 projects), Colombia (6 projects), Democratic Republic of the Congo (2 projects), Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, State of Palestine, Sierra Leone, Somalia (6 projects), Sri Lanka, Sudan, Yemen (2 projects), Kosovo[1]
14 IRRF Indicator 3.2.2.1.D measures “Number of contexts with national and local systems restored or adopted following crises: utilizing joint UN approaches to rebuilding rule of law and justice sector institutions and services”
Institution Building
! INSTRUCTIONS: Scroll < > to view additional table columns
Expected Programme Outputs |
Output Indicators2 |
Baseline |
Results |
||||||
Value |
Year |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 Target |
2019 Actual |
Key Evidence |
||
Output 2: Capable justice and security institutions are established and strengthened to increase and improve service delivery in crisis affected and transitional settings. |
2.1 Number of contexts where justice and security services reach out to an increasing and/or more inclusive number of people |
2415 |
2015 |
2616 |
2817 |
2918 |
27 |
31 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: ACHIEVED |
2.2 Number of contexts with |
6 |
201619 |
620 |
721 |
822 |
8 |
10 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: ACHIEVED |
|
15 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo[1]
16 2016 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo[1]
17 2017 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo[1]
18 2018 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guatemala, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo[1]
19 Baselines for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator.
20 2016 Contexts: Colombia, Guatemala, Iraq, Jordan, Liberia, Somalia
21 2017 Contexts: Central African Republic, Guatemala, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Somalia, Kosovo[1]
22 2018 Contexts: Central African Republic, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Somalia, Kosovo[1]
Community Security
! INSTRUCTIONS: Scroll < > to view additional table columns
Expected Programme Outputs |
Output Indicators2 |
Baseline |
Results |
||||||
Value |
Year |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 Target |
2019 Actual |
Key Evidence |
||
Output 3: Comprehensive community security approaches are developed, strengthened, and/or applied. |
3.1 Number of contexts where gender-sensitive, evidence-based security strategies for reducing armed violence and/or controlling small arms are in operation at the community level |
623 |
2015 |
714 |
825 |
1626 |
7 |
15 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: ACHIEVED |
3.2 Number of contexts with community-oriented policing programmes developed and/or operational |
2015 |
1129 |
1230 |
1931 |
13 |
19 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: ACHIEVED |
||
23 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Guinea (Conakry), Nepal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo[1]
24 2016 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Guinea (Conakry), Nepal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo[1],
25 2017 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Nepal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo[1]
26 2018 Contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Kosovo[1]
27 IRRF Indicator 3.2.2.1.C measures “Number of contexts with national and local systems restored or adopted following crises: community-oriented security services and oversight mechanisms”
28 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Jordan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo[1]
29 2016 Contexts: Afghanistan, Jordan, Liberia, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo[1]
30 2017 Contexts: Afghanistan, Iraq, Jordan, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Tunisia, Ukraine,Kosovo[1]
31 2018 Contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo[1]
Human Rights Systems
! INSTRUCTIONS: Scroll < > to view additional table columns
Expected Programme Outputs |
Output Indicators |
Baseline |
Results |
||||||
Value |
Year |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 Target |
2019 Actual |
Key Evidence |
||
Output 4: National human rights systems are strengthened and made more effective in promoting and protecting human rights. |
4.1 Number of contexts with strengthened operational institutions supporting the fulfillment of nationally and internationally ratified human rights obligations |
1032 |
2015 |
1233 |
1834 |
2435 |
12 |
24 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: ACHIEVED |
4.2 Number of contexts receiving assistance to improve or maintain NHRI rating from the GHANRI Sub-Committee on Accreditation37 |
8 |
2017 |
- |
838 |
939 |
18 |
10 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: PARTIALLY ACHIEVED |
|
32 Baseline Contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Sierra Leone, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Yemen, Kosovo[1]
33 2016 Contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Sierra Leone, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Kosovo[1]
34 2017 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo[1]
35 2018 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo[1]
36 IRRF Indicator 2.2.3.1 measures “Number of additional contexts with strengthened institutions and systems supporting fulfilment of nationally and internationally ratified human rights obligations: rule of law and justice, and human rights”
37 Indicator 4.2 was changed from “number of contexts with NHRIs receiving an “A status” rating from the GANHRI Sub-Committee on Accreditation” in 2017 to better reflect the contributions of the global programme. Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2017 are the same for this indicator.
38 2017 Contexts: Haiti, Liberia, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Somalia, Ukraine
39 2018 Contexts: Central African Republic, Haiti, Iraq, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Ukraine
Access to Justice
! INSTRUCTIONS: Scroll < > to view additional table columns
Expected Programme Outputs |
Output Indicators |
Baseline |
Results |
||||||
Value |
Year |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 Target |
2019 Actual |
Key Evidence |
||
Output 5: Access to justice for all is increased – particularly for vulnerable and marginalized groups, including minorities – and discrimination, exclusion and other drivers.40 |
5.1 Number of additional people who have access to justice |
129,933 |
2015 |
209,444 |
431,086 |
27,999,95641 |
30,935,288 |
29,527,239 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: PARTIALLY ACHIEVED |
5.3 Number of contexts with active access to justice and/or legal aid programmes in place at the community level |
1243 |
2015 |
1844 |
2345 |
2546 |
21 |
26 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: ACHIEVED |
|
40 GPRF Indicator 5.2 “Cases receiving judgment in the first instance of the formal justice system” is not measured in UNDP Strategic Plan (2018-2021).
41 2018 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina , Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Kosovo[1]
42 IRRF indicator 2.2.3.2.A measures “Total number of additional population who have access to justice.” The previous IRRF indicator 3.4.1 (UNDP Strategic Plan 2013-2017) linked to GPRF indicator 5.1 measured “Total number of people who have access to legal aid services.”
43 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Colombia, Iraq, Jordan, Nepal, Pakistan, Somalia, State of Palestine, Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo[1]
44 2016 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Nepal, Pakistan, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Kosovo[1]
45 2017 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Kosovo[1]
46 2018 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Ukraine, Kosovo[1]
Transitional Justice
! INSTRUCTIONS: Scroll < > to view additional table columns
Expected Programme Outputs |
Output Indicators |
Baseline |
Results |
||||||
Value |
Year |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 Target |
2019 Actual |
Key Evidence |
||
Output 6: Transitional justice processes and/or mechanisms are promoted in conflict-affected contexts47 |
6.2 Number of contexts with transitional justice processes and/or mechanisms in place |
1048 |
2015 |
1249 |
1150 |
1451 |
13 |
15 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: |
47 GPRF Indicator 6.1 6.1 “Total number of victims whose grievances cases are addressed within transitional justice processes” is not measured in UNDP Strategic Plan (2018-2021).
48 Baseline Contexts: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Guatemala, Libya, South Sudan, Tunisia, Yemen, Kosovo[1]
49 2016 Contexts: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Liberia, Libya, South Sudan, Sudan, Tunisia, Kosovo[1]
50 2017 Contexts: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Libya, South Sudan, Sudan, Sri Lanka, Tunisia
51 2018 Contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Haiti, Libya, Mali, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Tunisia
52 IRRF Indicator 3.2.2.1.B measures “Number of contexts with national and local systems restored or adopted following crises: victim redress mechanisms including transitional justice”
Gender Justice
! INSTRUCTIONS: Scroll < > to view additional table columns
Expected Programme Outputs |
Output Indicators |
Baseline |
Results |
||||||
Value |
Year |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 Target |
2019 Actual |
Key Evidence |
||
Output 7: Human rights, access to justice, and security for women and girls are increased.53 |
7.1 Number of contexts with programmes in place to increase women’s representation in the justice and security sectors |
554 |
2016 |
555 |
756 |
1157 |
10 |
14 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: ACHIEVED |
7.2 Number of contexts that have a strengthened legal and/or policy framework in place to prevent and address sexual and gender-based violence |
358 |
2015 |
759 |
960 |
1561 |
10 |
19 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: |
|
7.3 Number of contexts with justice and security services and other mechanisms/ processes in place to prevent, respond to, and address sexual and gender-based violence
|
1163 |
2015 |
2064 |
1965 |
2366 |
17 |
24 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: ACHIEVED |
|
53 GPRF indicator 7.4 “Existence of new and strengthened legal aid and justice services to prevent and address sexual and gender-based violence” is not measured in UNDP Strategic Plan (2018-2021).
54 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator.
55 2016 Contexts: Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Nepal, Pakistan, Timor-Leste
56 2017 Contexts: Afghanistan, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Timor-Leste
57 2018 Contexts: Afghanistan, Guinea-Bissau, Lebanon, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste, Tunisia
58 Baseline Contexts: Sierra Leone, Sudan, Kosovo[1]
59 2016 Contexts: Afghanistan, Mali, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Kosovo[1]
60 2017 Contexts: Afghanistan, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sri Lanka, South Sudan, Sudan, Kosovo[1]
61 2018 Contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Nepal, Somalia, Sudan, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo[1]
62 IRRF Indicator 1.6.2.2.A measures “Number of additional contexts with frameworks in place to prevent and respond to SGBV: Multi-sectoral policy and legislation”
63 Baseline Contexts: Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan
64 2016 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Timor-Leste, Ukraine
65 2017 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea (Conakry), Iraq, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Timor-Leste, Ukraine
66 2018 Contexts: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq, Kyrgyz Republic, Liberia, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, State of Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Timor-Leste, Ukraine
67 IRRF Indicator 1.6.2.2.B measures “Number of additional contexts with frameworks in place to prevent and respond to SGBV: multi-sectoral services including justice and security”
Programme
! INSTRUCTIONS: Scroll < > to view additional table columns
Expected Programme Outputs |
Output Indicators |
Baseline |
Results |
||||||
Value |
Year |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 Target |
2019 Actual |
Key Evidence |
||
Output 8: High quality programming is assured through improved quality assurances processes, mainstreamed human rights in programming, and strengthening of external partnerships. |
8.1 Number of projects/programmes undertaking a uniform M&E approach |
268 |
2016 |
269 |
470 |
571 |
15 |
7 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: The annual target is: PARTIALLY ACHIEVED |
8.2 Number of projects/programmes utilizing HRBA and SES |
1972 |
2016 |
1973 |
2274 |
2875 |
25 |
37 |
2019 Contexts: Means of Verification: |
|
8.3 Number of ongoing and/or new external partnership agreements and opportunities supporting the delivery of UN rule of law and human rights assistance |
777 |
2016 |
778 |
1479 |
1580 |
4 |
17 |
2019 Partnerships: |
|
68 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator.
69 2016 Contexts: Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau
70 2017 Contexts: Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Jordan, Guinea-Bissau
71 2018 Contexts: Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Jordan, Guinea-Bissau
72 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator.
73 2016 Contexts: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan (2 projects), Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal (2 projects), Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo[1]
74 2017 Contexts: SES: Afghanistan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan (2 projects), Kyrgyz Republic, Mali, Myanmar, Nepal (2 projects), Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Tunisia, Ukraine, Kosovo[1]
75 2018 was an off year for Quality Assurance Assessments during the implementation phase; thus, the number of projects reported are lower. 2018 Contexts: Burundi, Bosnia and Herzegovina (2 projects), Central African Republic, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Haiti, Jordan, Kyrgyz Republic, Mali (2 projects), Myanmar, Lebanon, Liberia (2 projects), Somalia (3 projects), South Sudan, State of Palestine (2 projects), Sudan, Syria, Ukraine (2 projects), Yemen, Kosovo[1]
76 Information verified through the “UNDP Quality Assurance Assessments” is data gathered from corporate mechanisms to assure adherence to quality standards. As of 2018, UNDP only requires Quality Assurance Assessments during the implementation phase of a project every other year as well as at the design and closure of a project. Projects included in this indicator are ranked “satisfactory” or above when it comes to utilizing the SES standards, which includes HRBA as an overarching principle, and as of 2018, is categorized under the “Principled” criteria of UNDP’s Quality Assurance Assessments.
77 Baselines and targets for Global Programme indicators not previously reported on were determined following the first year of Phase 3 implementation and reporting (2016). Thus, baselines and actuals for the year of 2016 are the same for this indicator.
78 2016 Partnerships: The Global Focal Point for Police Justice, and Corrections; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance; UNDP - OHCHR - GANHRI Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions, The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies; Clingendael, The Folke Bernadotte Academy, International Security Sector Advisory Team
79 2017 Partnerships: The Folke Bernadotte Academy; The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies ; Clingendael; The Global Focal Point for Police Justice, and Corrections; The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law; The International Center for Transitional Justice; International Security Sector Advisory Team; Namati Grassroots Justice Prize; New York University’s Center for International Cooperation’s Pathfinders/ International Task Force on Justice; Overseas Development Institute; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Open Society Justice Initiative Measuring Justice Initiative; Private Sector Partnership for the Rule of Law; UNDP - OHCHR - GANHRI Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance
80 2018 Partnerships: The Folke Bernadotte Academy; The Global Alliance for Reporting on Peaceful, Just, and Inclusive Societies ; Clingendael; The Global Focal Point for Police Justice, and Corrections; The Hague Institute for Innovation of Law; The International Center for Transitional Justice; International Security Sector Advisory Team; Namati Grassroots Justice Prize; New York University’s Center for International Cooperation’s Pathfinders / International Task Force on Justice; Overseas Development Institute; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the Open Society Justice Initiative Measuring Justice Initiative; Private Sector Partnership for the Rule of Law; University of Pennsylvania Law School/Chubb Rule of Law Fellowship, UNDP - OHCHR - GANHRI Partnership to Support National Human Rights Institutions; UNDP and UNHCR Global Partnership on Rule of Law and Governance; UNDP – UN Women – UNFPA Partnership on Gender Justice